Guest Posted May 21, 2017 Report Share Posted May 21, 2017 I take no credit for this, I found it on reddit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloofyFloof Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 Seems like the image is down or I can't see it. So here's one I've found, hope it helps/ is similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blutze Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 There is an iframe in Shafty's post linking to the correct imgur album, but apparently our new forum layout broke it and doesn't display it. Here, have a direct link: https://imgur.com/a/h0D6p 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edelweiss Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 Weird thing to ask, but which one is the "correct one." Because I've always used the one Floofy posted, and for the rockets I mostly use. (OG, VL, VR) it works completely fine, or is it the one that Blutze posted with the differing system. I'm asking because I know for definite Floofy's image works, and I'm wondering if I have to "re-learn." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blutze Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 Vericht mentioned that RHS tweaked their trajectories to something more realistic recently, though I can't find any mention of that in the patch notes. I also haven't used these extensively enough to say for sure (our missions usually call for an all-AT loadout, and the images agree on the trajectories of the two best choices for that application)... my gut feeling is that the fragmentation pencil belonging to the superlight, superfar category seems more believable. Unless it has a weaker rocket motor, which I kinda doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flying spaghetti monster Posted January 26, 2018 Report Share Posted January 26, 2018 On 12/5/2017 at 12:03, Edelweiss said: Weird thing to ask, but which one is the "correct one." Because I've always used the one Floofy posted, and for the rockets I mostly use. (OG, VL, VR) it works completely fine, or is it the one that Blutze posted with the differing system. I'm asking because I know for definite Floofy's image works, and I'm wondering if I have to "re-learn." The picture that Floofy posted used to be the correct model that RHS used in the past was but slightly changed a year ago. The Picture Below is from an ArmA 2 Guide but it is the correct ranging for the PGO-7V3 optic both in ArmA 3 and in real life. Image source: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=232486692 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flying spaghetti monster Posted January 26, 2018 Report Share Posted January 26, 2018 On 12/5/2017 at 12:44, Blutze said: my gut feeling is that the fragmentation pencil belonging to the superlight, superfar category seems more believable. Unless it has a weaker rocket motor, which I kinda doubt. The OG-7V weighs less than the PG-7V and the PG-7VL but just has poor range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TredBobek Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 On 2018. 01. 26. at 16:52, flying spaghetti monster said: The OG-7V weighs less than the PG-7V and the PG-7VL but just has poor range. Yeah I just tested the scope. I was looking at the old one that Floofy posted and I was a bit confused with the fragmentation round because it wasn't the upper left BTW there's an airburst rocket too (Type something), that uses the upper left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts